50 Responses to “DSC TX7 Cyber shot® Digital Camera TX7 Sony Sony Style USA”

1. Dzarifin96 says:

   2010-08-16 at 01:35

   Which better, Tx7 or Tx5 ?
2. kongktd says:

   2010-08-16 at 01:36

   @haiderstar7 tats is beacause u dont play in the water…
3. HIGHOFFCANDY211 says:

   2010-08-16 at 02:07

   is this thing water proof???
4. coolnightshadow says:

   2010-08-16 at 02:12

   is it water proof?
5. erikgamero123 says:

   2010-08-16 at 03:05

   i bought this camera today and it came with this thing. its like a little station. it has DC/in/USB/HDMI/and A/V out. what is this used for?
6. vmai908 says:

   2010-08-16 at 03:16

   omg i want it!!!
7. jenp009 says:

   2010-08-16 at 03:23

   @iLuVsHoEs64 10.2 mp
8. Starfishrider says:

   2010-08-16 at 03:29

   Just ordered one and can’t wait to get it !!!
9. RolaxC12 says:

   2010-08-16 at 04:06

   i love
10. MistookBrooke says:

    2010-08-16 at 04:16

    Oh my god this camera is so amazing!! I am probably getting mine today! =D
11. madcow15792 says:

    2010-08-16 at 05:01

    jesus christ how much does that cost?? I’m guessing a fortune? O.O
12. DmMAGIC says:

    2010-08-16 at 05:47

    i love o=how at the end it says “All screen images stimulated” hahaha i can’t wait to go get this camera it looks fantastic.
13. DmMAGIC says:

    2010-08-16 at 06:20

    @iLuVsHoEs64 10.12
14. earthypig says:

    2010-08-16 at 06:31

    I just got this as a present today ~ i’m sooo psyched! ^_^
15. jrtwothreeninesix says:

    2010-08-16 at 07:24

    i just ordered this in dark blue. i needed a new camera since mines was a piece of shit. its going to be awesome can’t wait.
16. GreenDotDress says:

    2010-08-16 at 07:50

    would you guys recommend it?
    how good is the quality?
    price??
    Thnx =3
17. iLuVsHoEs64 says:

    2010-08-16 at 08:39

    how many mega pixels????
18. bluerainbug says:

    2010-08-16 at 09:24

    it’s actually a very nice camera! I’ve done a little research, it’s the only one in it’s class of compact digicams capable of recording in 1080, no other brand has achieved this that I know of.
19. skjoyner says:

    2010-08-16 at 10:07

    @daysAnatomy No, but the TX5 is, and it’s more rugged. You mono mic on it tho. But it does pretty good. For low light quality and mic quality Youtube search;

    Sony DSC-TX5 Test Video 1
20. Starfishrider says:

    2010-08-16 at 10:36

    Man I can’t believe I was thinking about buying Kodak Zi8 or Flip. TX7 is a kick ass upgrade for my old Sony DSC T-33.
21. daysAnatomy says:

    2010-08-16 at 11:28

    @daysAnatomy
    Stop talking to yourself.
    Oh, OK.
22. daysAnatomy says:

    2010-08-16 at 12:18

    @daysAnatomy
    I Googled it and then gave myself a thumbs down for ignorance.
23. tinymovingparts says:

    2010-08-16 at 12:40

    i bet it actually sux balls
24. eyeh2809 says:

    2010-08-16 at 12:53

    ahhhhhhhh the the technology these days —-amazing
25. daysAnatomy says:

    2010-08-16 at 13:50

    @haiderstar7
    Is the TX7 not waterproof then?
26. c0LdPlayR0cKs says:

    2010-08-16 at 14:21

    Would you recommend the a200 or the canon eos 400D?
27. mihaisorin2000 says:

    2010-08-16 at 15:16

    Me too!!

    It`s awsome!!
28. bammargeraskate96 says:

    2010-08-16 at 15:16

    Hi im new to photograpy and im thinking of buying a dslr what should i get for £300 or less and the lenses are a reasonable price? thanks
29. cutterschoicenotmine says:

    2010-08-16 at 15:39

    i dunno, your better saving your money now and going for a canon 1000d or maybe a 550 if u fancy saving more. the lack of movie mode and high raw processing times along with some what high noise at 800+ iso makes this camera a little bit old now.
30. blackxthink says:

    2010-08-16 at 16:02

    @Cagey75

    Search for the pentax D2000 (the white one)
31. jameslove1 says:

    2010-08-16 at 16:50

    Mate what you are talking about is a ‘jack-of-all-trades’ glitchy gadget. This is a professional DSLR camera, which costs a lot of money.
32. ReallyHaylee says:

    2010-08-16 at 17:23

    I got this cameria last year for my birthday. I don’t really know anything about it but I think it sucks. I wish it could record
33. Cagey75 says:

    2010-08-16 at 17:59

    Seriously considering one. Who says it’s ugly? i think it’s pretty solid looking. better looking than a pentax at least!
34. wholesaleelectronic says:

    2010-08-16 at 18:30

    why buy a camera and just take pictures. buy a 9 in one and take picture, video, listen to mp3′s, mp4′s, voice recording, webcam, mass storage all in one!
    check out this video for more
    youtube. com/watch?v=WweH2X6z9ZE
35. DOONERJUSTGOTTADOIT says:

    2010-08-16 at 18:50

    i wanted a d40..but they have stopped selling them. Not to good they dont have an af motor ..entry level id go for a sony or nikon d3000
36. IsDorian says:

    2010-08-16 at 19:45

    me too

    this on or the nikon d40?
    someone answer me please
37. donwinkey says:

    2010-08-16 at 20:16

    That camera looks damn awful. Eyepiece is a nightmare of course that could be replaced. Hopefully. Better get this camera than d40.
38. tewjenkinson says:

    2010-08-16 at 20:27

    i don’t know either ahhh!!!
39. kabir52 says:

    2010-08-16 at 20:31

    This or the Nikon d40?
40. kelvs45 says:

    2010-08-16 at 21:16

    which is better? canon slr or this?
41. excalabus says:

    2010-08-16 at 21:39

    I have expanded my knowledge of this camera since the time of my previous posting, so I am no longer in need of assistance. Thanks anyway.
42. Schneeerich says:

    2010-08-16 at 22:24

    what lense do u have on it ? Kit-Lense ?
    which programm do u use: Auto, P, and so on?
43. Sungkawa says:

    2010-08-16 at 23:01

    it’s a nice Cam i one to !
    what I like most about it is that it is compatible with old Minolta AF lenses so you can purchase cheap lenses for it and they work perfectly!
44. excalabus says:

    2010-08-16 at 23:31

    I have this camera, and being somewhat new to photography, I was wondering if you could help me with a query. I have noticed that the exposures take quite a long time. Even with the shutter speed being capable of up to 1/4000, the camera rarely goes beyond 1/100 indoors in normal lighting, and 1/300 outdoors on a bright day. Would you consider this to be normal for this camera, or some sort of issue to adress, because as I see it, it is not performing as it should.
45. 1mog3n says:

    2010-08-17 at 00:07

    Now I know where i’m getting mine… I didn’t realise they sold them!!
46. dunkmack says:

    2010-08-17 at 00:53

    good choice sir.
47. masticina says:

    2010-08-17 at 01:21

    I agree low light performance is very nice. Just don’t raise the ISO to high
48. illuminarias says:

    2010-08-17 at 01:48

    yes you can. most of the DSLR ( or all?? ) can do that
49. McKIllaG5 says:

    2010-08-17 at 02:21

    I was going to buy a Sony DSLR because I had a sony DSLR looking camera but was a point and shoot. But after I played with a Sony DSLR I found that I was completely confused about how to work it, I tried using a 450D and found that I understood it from the start so I have gone with that instead.
50. chinnychoo says:

    2010-08-17 at 02:49

    Just picked up my A200 with 18-70mm from Argos of all places at just £259.99. Had to drive 60 miles for it though… but hey, superb in every way. Low light performance is VERY impressive!!